Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology ; 33:986-987, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2125671

ABSTRACT

Background: Repeated vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 increases serological response in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with high interindividual variability. Still, no decision support tool exists to predict SARS-CoV-2 vaccination response in KTR. Method(s): We developed, internally and externally validated five different multivariable prediction models of serological response after the third and fourth vaccine dose against SARS-CoV-2 in KTR. Using 27 candidate predictor variables, we applied statistical and machine learning approaches including logistic regression (LR), LASSO LR, random forest, and gradient boosted regression trees. For development and internal validation, data from 585 vaccinations were used. External validation was performed in four independent, international validation datasets comprising 191, 184, 254, and 321 vaccinations, respectively. Result(s): Internal validation using a rigorous resampling approach showed AUC-ROC of 0.825 for LASSO LR, which was then used for model fitting and external validation. LASSO LR performed on the whole development dataset yielded a 23- and 11-variable model, respectively. External validation showed ROC-AUC of 0.855, 0.749, 0.828, and 0.763 for the sparser 11-variable model, yielding an overall AUC-ROC of 0.809, and a negative predictive value of 0.752. The 23-variable model showed AUC-ROC of 0.853, 0.714, 0.844, and 0.778 in four independent validation sets, yielding an overall AUC-ROC of 0.818, and a negative predictive value of 0.795. Conclusion(s): Both, an 11- and 23-variable LASSO LR model predict vaccination response in KTR with good AUC-ROC. Implemented as an online tool at https://www.txvaccine. com, it can guide decisions when choosing between different immunization strategies to improve protection against COVID-19 in KTR. (Figure Presented).

2.
American Journal of Transplantation ; 22(Supplement 3):596-597, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2063385

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Mortality from COVID-19 among kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is unacceptably high, and their response to up to three vaccinations against SARSCoV- 2 is strongly impaired. We provide the first systematic analysis of serological response to up to five repeated vaccinations in nonresponding KTR. Method(s): We retrospectively analyzed serological response to basic immunization, as well as administration of three, four and five doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in KTR from December 27, 2020 until December 31, 2021. In particular, the influence of different dose adjustment regimens for mycophenolic acid (MPA) on serological response to fourth vaccination was analyzed. Result(s): In total, 4.277 vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 in 1.478 patients were analyzed. Serological response was 19.5% after 1.203 basic immunizations, and increased to 29.4%, 55.6%, and 57.5% after 603 third, 250 fourth and 40 fifth vaccinations, resulting in a cumulative response rate of 88.7% (figure 1A-B). Patients with belatacept immunosuppression show impaired cumulative serological response (4.4%, 12.4%, and 16.4%) in comparison to patients with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)- based immunosuppression (19.1%, 37.6%, and 70.1%) after basic immunization, three, and four vaccinations (figure 1C-F). In patients with CNI and MPA maintenance immunosuppression, pausing MPA and adding 5 mg prednisolone equivalent before the fourth vaccination increased serological response rate to 75% in comparison to no dose adjustment (52%) or dose reduction (46%) without occurence of rejections (figure 2). Conclusion(s): Repeated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of up to five times effectively induces serological response in kidney transplant recipients. It can be enhanced by pausing MPA at the time of vaccination. Patients with belatacept immunosuppression are unlikely to achieve sufficient serological response and require different approaches.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL